So now that the Supreme Court has ruled that Obamacare is constitutional based on Congress’ ability to tax. Now, Obama is saying it is not a tax. Does this mean that he is saying it is not constitutional and that it is not a law. Ha! It passed Congress as a tax bill. Oh, and since it is not a tax, why the need for so many IRS agents to enforce getting this, um, penalty?
But, since in his eyes it is not a tax but a penalty, I figured it was time to look up a few definitions to see what the difference will be.
: the suffering in person, rights, or property that is annexed by law or judicial decision to the commission of a crime or public offense
: the suffering or the sum to be forfeited to which a person agrees to be subjected in case of non-fulfillment of stipulations
a : a charge usually of money imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes
b : a sum levied on members of an organization to defray expenses
So, the words don’t have the exact same meaning. Although there are a few who would argue that they suffer when they pay taxes. It wasn’t until I began to look at the thesaurus that I found something interesting. It has to do with the word fine, which means to penalize in a financial way. In the list of synonyms I saw the word tax. So, I can say either that Obamatax will penalize someone who doesn’t buy health insurance or Obamatax will tax someone who doesn’t by health insurance.
They can use penalty and penalize to describe it but when it comes down to the meanings of the words still end up meaning tax. You can pick a word to make it sound better but the definition of the word doesn’t change.
Or perhaps rather than calling it a penalty or a tax, it should be called what it is…corporate welfare to the 1%. Thanks occupiers, you got what you wanted by being played by the 1% as they begged you not to protest against them. Please don’t throw me in the briar patch, oh yeah that story is no longer being taught since historical stories aren’t politically correct.